If music be the food of life…
Monday, October 16th, 2006
Ah yes, here we are again. Another week, another youth group evening come and gone. Aye me and alas! Parting is such sweet sorrow. Happily, it occurs to me that there is a remedy for this aforementioned sorrow. So… by your leave– which you have no way of giving (how I love a good one-sided conversation!) let’s… dredge up the past!!!
This Friday, we regressed back to the good ol’ days of yore (’roundabouts kindergarten), and had ourselves an exciting game of show-and-tell. But fear not! We sufficiently up-dated it to suit the sophisticated tastes of our most aged members (clocking in at a ripe old seventeen), and so, in an innovative new form, this tried-and-true game was reintroduced to the masses as “Showing And Telling: The Musical Version!†(cymbal clash!). There were a couple assumptions at play here: 1) Music, somewhere in its infinite variety, holds an unshakeable place in many a heart. 2) Folk get pretty excited about introducing their most-cherished tunes to the ears of others. 3) Lively and worthwhile discussion can be generated by analyzing such things. So, the town crier sounded the alarm, and Friday found many painstakingly selected C.D.s lovingly conveyed into the youth room.
The discussion centred on “Art”: Whether the art of the song is Good or Bad and whether the message is Good or Bad. It was eye opening. Obviously, it’s a big, wide musical world out there! There were some interesting points made in defence of beloved songs, and overall, you could see that people consciously consider why their favourite appeals to them. However, past all that, it sort of raised the question: how often do we exercise our conscious–and, uh…”conscience”– consideration?
I don’t think anyone would argue about the commercialism of our culture– if in doubt, just note the transformation of highway-bordering wasteland, to “prime” billboard-advertising space. We live in an eye-catching, dizzying world of sales pitches and advertising. We are bombarded by strategic products that anticipate our tastes, and argue that they are “just the thing” we want. Sometimes they are. But sometimes, they are just “close enough.”
We find a show that delivers the belly-laugh humour we want, but not the morals that are important to us. Our song of the moment is oh-so-danceable, but we won’t play it if there are children nearby. And these are the things that begin to define us. Because, if our culture’s message: “You are what you consume” is even partly true, what are we? Compromisers? Maybe it’s a test to see how important what we believe REALLY is to us. Or maybe it’s a test to see WHAT we really believe. Either way, are the results flattering? If we are sincere, Romans calls us to “hate what is evil; cling to what is good” (12:9).
Maybe half the problem is that, as we look around, we can see the good mixed in with the bad. Why throw the baby out with the bathwater, right? But maybe the other half of the problem is that we’ve become too satisfied with compromised goods (hmm, that’s almost a pun: “compromised good”?). Do we even know what the “baby” is supposed to look like, anymore? Maybe we’ve lowered our standards too far; maybe we don’t need these things as much as we’ve been convinced that we do.
Whew! It appears I’ve reached my “dramatic rhetorical question” quota for the day. I won’t leave you with any more questions–the truth is, I’m out! But as a “fun-filled” exercise this week (because who ever REALLY gets enough homework? –ooops! There’s another one! I just can’t stop!) why not flex your consumer conscience, and see what sort of shape it’s in. So, that’s it. Tune in next week for another dose of “Shakesperiencing reality, one byte at a time.†(Now I sound like a commercial! Watch out, it’s contagious!)

